Archive for the ‘Business Intelligence’ Category

Organizational Issues for Business Intelligence Thesis

Wednesday, March 16th, 2011

I am in my final semester for a Masters in Business Intelligence. I started the program two years ago, hence the lack of activity this site. I look forward to writing again after graduation.

I would like to write my thesis on organizational issues around business intelligence. Instead of the typical BI technology slant, I want to examine best practices in organization design, talent development, and operational processes for BI and business analytics. I’m still working out the details but it could explore topics such as:

  • Factors that would influence one organizational design over another — e.g. centralized vs. decentralized, utility model of buying analytic talent vs. embed capability in the business,
  • Approaches for talent development — e.g. grow internally, hire from outside, essential skills, etc.,
  • Operational management of business intelligence projects — what processes must be in place, who owns them, IT-ownership vs. business-ownership, agile vs. big bang project management,
  • Enterprise cultural and change management issues related to becoming an analytic organization.

To help me settle on a topic, I’m searching for materials that discuss these ideas. If you have ideas on the topics or potential resources, please drop me a note or enter a comment. In the near term, I’m specifically looking for:

  1. Current resources that explore these topics including books, webcasts, journal articles, white papers, etc.  Must be published in the past two years.
  2. Names of thought leaders regarding the people/process side of business intelligence with design and implementation experience in larger enterprises.  I’ve seen most of the big consulting company and vendor materials.  I’d like to develop a list of boutique firms and independent thought leaders to get a different perspective on the topic.

Thanks much. Stay tuned. I hope to eventually publish this thesis.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Technologies That Are Reshaping Business Intelligence

Monday, August 31st, 2009

What do predictive analytics, real-time monitoring, in-memory processing, and SaaS have in common?  According Doug Henschen at InformationWeek, they’re all a part of next-generation business intelligence.

Next-generation BI has arrived, and three major factors are driving it: the spread of predictive analytics, more real-time performance monitoring, and much faster analysis, thanks to in-memory BI. A fourth factor, software as a service, promises to further alter the BI market by helping companies get these next-generation systems running more quickly.

Interesting article with a number of good points.  What’s your take?

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Randomness – Birds and Business

Wednesday, October 1st, 2008

See the original post here. The post describes an interview with a birder and a doctor. They discuss similarities between pattern recognition in bird identification, medical diagnosis and business. Here’s an insightful quote:

HBR:  Does randomness have a role to play in birding?

Sibley:

Even then these vagrant birds (ones not expected to be in a certain location) tend to show up in places that have a pattern of rare birds turning up.  So they’re probably not random occurrence but a pattern we haven’t worked out yet.

ThinkingAnalytically discussion starters:

  • Can you think of a time that an apparent set of random data turned out to be an undiscovered pattern?  What was it?
  • How do you avoid claiming a random situation too early?

Use the comments to contribute.

Purchase full the HBR article here.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Name of the Game or Visualization of Presidential Debates

Wednesday, April 30th, 2008


This amazing, interactive visualization was put together by the folks at the NY Times. It diagrams communication patterns of Presidential debate participants through mid-December 2007. In a nutshell, a line is drawn from one candidate to another each time the first candidate mentions the name of the other during the debate. To fully appreciate it, checkout the original and play for a bit. There’s a tremendous amount of information in one graphic including:

  • Number of debates a candidate participated in (represented by slice)
  • Political affiliation (represented by color
  • Number of references a candidate made to other candidates (number of outgoing arrows)
  • Number of references made to a particular candidate from other candidates (incoming arrows)
  • Timing of such references within a particular debate (location of out going arrow)
  • Timing of references over time (slices are organized by sequence of debates)

The technique is relatively simple but yet powerful. Though it may look like the output of my childhood spirograph, it is more like an inter-relationship digraph and generates interesting observations such as:

  • Democrats apparently talk about each other much more than the republicans
  • Democrat candidates that dropped earlier tended to be referenced fewer times (no surprise)
  • Every candidate mentioned Clinton at least once

What do you see?

Thanks to A Beautiful WWW for bringing this to my attention!

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Putting More Science into Management

Tuesday, December 11th, 2007

This month, McKinsey Quarterly published eight technology-enabled trends they feel will help shape businesses and the economy. Trend seven is near and dear to my heart – or should I say head? Putting more science into management falls under the heading of leveraging information in new ways. The authors explore some of analytical topics that are all the buzz in recent best sellers: “ideagoras”, customer segmentation, experimentation, prediction markets and recommendation engines.

Leaders should get out ahead of this trend to ensure that information makes organizations more rather than less effective. Information is often power; broadening access and increasing transparency will inevitably influence organizational politics and power structures. Environments that celebrate making choices on a factual basis must beware of analysis paralysis.

The close by suggesting the following books:

I’ve only read the first.  I’m interested in any reviews of the others.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Visual Analytics for e-Discovery

Thursday, November 15th, 2007

What could be better than paying lawyers less money for more work? (Sorry Pat.)

In today’s world, litigation typically involves the review of thousands, if not millions, of e-docs. Though shredders can permanently destroy a paper document, past e-mails and e-docs hide in all types of digital nooks and crannies. Unfortunately, many companies have not kept up with the proliferation of e-documents. But that’s no excuse when in the middle of litigation. If there’s a chance that a relevant e-doc exists, it typically must be found, reviewed and deemed relevant or not.

Sean McNee describes a recent case where a small legal team representing a small time inventor was able to use visual analytics to review and analyze the contents of 50 million pages of electronic documentation in just a few months. (Yes, 50 million pages.) He states,

“Visual analytics tools identify nouns and noun phrases in a series of messages, then visually cluster the documents together according to similarities in subject matter”

Apparently some Fortune 1000 companies have seen three-fold productivity increases using visual tools. According to the article, “U.S. corporations spend nearly $5 billion a year analyzing emails for litigation, regulatory requests and investigations.” A three-fold increase in productivity yields signficant benefits!

Read more at BI Review Online.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Latest BI Acquisition Ends Best-of-Breed

Wednesday, November 14th, 2007

In the latest round of tech acquisitions and mergers, IBM snatches Cognos. According this BusinessWeek article, this is a combination that might actually work. I think all of these big player acquisitions are creating havoc in large companies that have tried to standardize on enterprise solution providers. For instance, my company is clearly an IBM shop. No Oracle spoken there, but we’re a big user of Siebel and PeopleSoft. Oops, those are now Oracle products. Does that mean that there will be advantages in the future for Oracle users? I’m certainly no expert in the arena of enterprise software but it appears to me that the end of best-of-breed certainly has some downsides.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter